America’s culture has been tragically warped by the progressive left, which no longer accepts the colorblind standard of Martin Luther King but instead has persuaded the country to believe that whites are guilty before the fact and blacks are innocent even when the facts show otherwise. A racial morality play of white supremacy and black oppression has transformed the civil rights movement from a campaign against the denigration of individuals on the basis of their skin color, into a demand for preferences and privileges based on skin color.
Progressive Racism traces this transformation under the leadership of racial extortionists like Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson, who took a movement in support of American pluralism and infused it with a lynch-mob mentality against white Americans. The new civil rights crusade cynically bestows racial victim status on predators whose crimes are directed primarily against other African Americans.
David Horowitz has been a witness to these events and betrayals, starting with his participation in the civil rights movement of the 1960s. In 2001, he led a national campaign against a proposal for “slavery reparations” that would have required Americans who had no role in slavery to pay reparations to other Americans who were never slaves. In this book, Horowitz examines how the term “racism” has been drained of its original meaning and made into a weapon to bludgeon opponents into silence. He describes how today’s civil rights movement has become an oppressor of African Americans by supporting a failed school system in poor urban communities and a welfare system that has destroyed the black family and created an underclass dependent on government charity.
Progressive Racism is an indictment of the hypocrisy that now governs discourse on race, so that a lynch mob seeking to hang a police officer in Missouri because he was white can be portrayed as a civil rights protest and be supported by the first African American president of the United States.
David Horowitz discusses Progressive Racism on HausRules with Michael Hausam:
What sets apart David Horowitz’s essays on race is the sparkling clarity he brings to a subject often dominated by emotion and muddled thinking. “The Black Book of the American Left” showcases the author’s deep knowledge of the civil rights era and its tragic aftermath – how calls for color-blindness morphed into demands for racial preferences and a civil rights movement became a racial grievance industry. Horowitz’s fearless honesty makes this book essential. His verve, wit and down-to-earth prose make it a pleasure to read, besides.
–Jason L. Riley, Wall Street Journal columnist and author of Please Stop Helping Us: How Liberals Make It Harder for Blacks to Succeed
David Horowitz provides a road map to guide us through the landmine of race. His clear, honest thinking enables Americans to rid themselves of the fog of political correctness and to see race clearly. This is an indispensable book.
—Ward Connerly, Founder and Chairman of the American Civil Rights Institute
David Horowitz discusses Volume VI: Progressive Racism at the Wednesday Morning Club on May 13, 2016
Introduction to Volume VI: Progressive Racism
By David Horowitz
This is the sixth volume of my writings called The Black Book of the American Left. It is also one of the most important, as its subject—race—goes to the heart of the most problematic aspect of America’s history and heritage, and is thus the focus of the progressive assault on America and the American social contract. For obvious reasons, progressives have largely concentrated on one race in particular—American blacks, or “African-Americans” as they have come to be known through at least five permutations of political correctness in my lifetime: “coloreds,” “Negroes,” “blacks,” “persons of color” and—only then— “African-Americans.” The injustices of slavery and segregation and the historic sufferings of this community form a factual basis for the progressive indictment, which systematically ignores the historic gains—unprecedented and unparalleled—of this community because of America’s tolerant and liberating social contract.
The first essay in this volume, “The Reds and the Blacks,” explains how this indictment fits the left’s melodrama of “oppression” and “social justice,” and is merely an extension of Marx’s discredited formulas of “class oppression.” Parts I & II of the text that follows address the falling-away of the civil rights movement from the mission and values championed by Martin Luther King. An introduction, “Memories in Memphis,” is the account of my visit to the “National Civil Rights Museum” housed in the motel where King was murdered. This visit provided a summary moment in my efforts to understand these historic events. “Memories in Memphis” first appeared as the opening chapter in Hating Whitey and Other Progressive Causes. The original title of this book published in 1999 was “Hating White People Is a Politically Correct Idea.” This was an accurate description of the culture promoted by the new leaders of the civil rights movement, and—equally important—was the undeniable thrust of what was being taught in university curricula devoted to the malevolent race, gender and class “hierarchies,” which tenured leftists falsely claimed as structures of American society. The book was rejected by my publisher, Basic Books, whose editor told me, “We will never publish a book with that title.” His response indicated how completely the literary culture had succumbed to the new dispensation. I had to find an obscure publisher in Texas to get the book in print, and thus the upshot of trying to right an injustice was a dramatic diminishment of my career as an author.
Both essays, “The Red and the Black” and “Memories in Memphis,” were written in 1999, and the opening chapter of Part II, “The Race Card,” two years earlier. All the other chapters in this volume are organized in chronological order to form a running journal of the conflicts that followed the transformation of the civil rights cause. Until then it had been a movement to integrate African-Americans into America’s multi-ethnic democracy. In less than a decade it had become a movement led by demagogues to refashion racial grievances into a general assault on white people and on the country they were said to “dominate.” In its core agendas, the new civil rights movement was an assault on the basic American social contract, and in particular the 14th Amendment, with its commitment to equal rights under the law and thus to race-neutral standards and race-neutral governmental practices. Post-King civil rights became a movement to institutionalize racial preferences—the same kind of discriminatory practices that characterized segregation—and to recreate a race-conscious political culture in which blacks and a handful of designated minorities were singled out as the groups to be racially privileged. On other the side of the coin, whites were made targets of exclusion, suspicion and disapprobation.
Part III recounts an effort I undertook in the spring of 2001 to oppose a campaign by the left to gain reparations for slavery. This was a cause that had been first proposed in 1969, during the civil rights era, and rejected by every major civil rights organization. At the time of the proposal there were no slaves alive to receive reparations, while the vast majority of Americans who would be forced to pay reparations were descended from immigrants who had arrived in America well after slavery had been abolished. The clear goal of the radicals who launched the reparations campaign was to indict America as a racist society, and to sow the seeds of racial conflict. It was also an obvious shakedown effort of the kind that had come to characterize the civil rights leadership of Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton. In the winter of 2001, I published an account of these battles titled Uncivil Wars: The Controversy Over Reparations for Slavery, which explained why the issue of race was at the heart of the left’s assault.
Democratic congressman John Conyers was the author of the legislative bill supported by the reparations movement. During the controversy, a Republican majority in the House of Representatives prevented Conyers’s legislation from being passed out of the Judiciary Committee and sent to the House floor, a fact that the left seized on to insinuate that Republicans were racists. Yet when Democrats won control of the House in 2008 and Conyers became chair of the Judiciary Committee under a newly elected African American president, he did not bring the reparations bill to the floor. The reparations issue, which had been infused with such moral urgency until then, was apparently no longer a priority and disappeared from public view. Few episodes seem better designed to illustrate how race had become a political weapon for a movement driven more by its anti-American and anti-white animus than a desire to correct actual injustices.
Part IV of this volume examines the way attacks on a chimerical “white supremacy” have fostered a new progressive racism whose consequences have been destructive for all citizens. The principal target of this racism is the idea of equal treatment under Introduction xix the law—the idea that informs the American identity and unites its diverse communities into a single nation.
As in previous volumes, I have edited the individual pieces to eliminate repetitions where possible and enhance the overall readability of the text.
Introduction to Progressive Racism: The Reds and the Blacks 1
Part I: Decline and Fall of the Civil Rights Movement 11
1 · Memories in Memphis 13
2 · Clarence Page’s Race Problem, and Mine 23
3 · Black History Lesson 35
4 · Farrakhan and the Right 39
5 · A Washer Woman Shall Lead Them 43
6 · Alternative to Affirmative Action 47
7 · Progressives Support Racial Divisions 51
8 · Johnnie’s Other O.J. 55
9 · When “Civil Rights” Become Civil Wrongs 69
10 · An Academic Lynching 73
11 · Choke Your Coach, Become a Cause 77
12 · “Liberals” Want a Racial Monologue 81
13 · Hate Crimes Are Multicultural, Too 85
14 · One Who Will Not Be Missed 91
Part II : Racial Correctness 95
1 · The Race Card (co- authored with Peter Collier) 97
2 · Guns Don’t Kill Black People, Other Black People Do 107
3 · Time Magazine’s Attack 117
4 · Walk in My Shoes 125
5 · Cornel West: Affirmative Action Baby 133
6 · Reverse McCarthyism 139
7 · Throw Away the Key 143
8 · Racial Shakedowns 149
9 · Racial Killings & Gun Control 153
10 · The Lead Investigator Strikes Back 157
11 · Deafening Silence 161
12 · No Reason to Glorify the Left’s Legacy of Violence 165
13 · What Hillary Clinton Won’t Say 169
Part III: Reparations for Slavery 175
1 · Ten Reasons Why Reparations Are a Bad Idea 177
2 · Reparations Are Still a Bad Idea 189
3 · Racial McCarthyism on College Campuses 195
4 · The Underhanded Journalism of Jonathan Alter 199
5 · No Decency, No Shame 203
6 · A Protection Racket 211
7 · Reparations Buffoons on the Washington Mall 227
Part IV: Progressive Racism 225
1 · Death of the Civil Rights Movement 227
2 · Washington’s Disgraceful Report to the UN 241
3 · Racial Witch- Hunt 243
4 · Progressive Crime Wave 249
5 · Chris Matthews: White and Blind 255
6 · Racism at The Washington Post 265
7 · Blacks in Vietnam: Another Leftist Myth 267
8 · Freedom From Race 269
9 · The Casual Racism of Phil Donahue 273
10 · An Argument With the Racial Right 277
11 · African- American Lynch Mob 287
12 · Second Thoughts About Trayvon 289
13 · Black Skin Privilege and the American Dream 293
(co- authored with John Perazzo)